• What was inside these pottery vessels 3,000 years ago?

In Peninsular Malaysia, researchers have found something unexpected preserved in prehistoric pottery: traces of milk.

A new study analysed 15 pottery fragments from three archaeological cave sites—Gua Cha, Gua Kajang and Gua Harimau—using techniques that can identify microscopic traces of foods absorbed into ceramics.

Among the substances detected were caseins and β-lactoglobulin, proteins found in milk. Their presence provides the earliest direct evidence yet reported for dairy processing in equatorial Mainland Southeast Asia, dating to around 3,000 years ago.

Archaeologists have long struggled to establish when farming and animal domestication became part of life in prehistoric Peninsular Malaysia. Unlike sites further north in Southeast Asia, clear evidence of early livestock management and cultivation has been difficult to find here, partly because animal bones and plant remains are often poorly preserved.

The milk proteins suggest that Neolithic communities were processing dairy products thousands of years ago. This does not necessarily mean they were raising dairy animals locally but it provides an important new piece of evidence for understanding food production and consumption in the region.

The researchers also identified traces of plant and animal foods, suggesting that these vessels were used for a variety of food-processing activities.

Reference
Goh et al. 2026. “Pottery residues provide earliest direct evidence for domestication and dairy processing in equatorial Mainland Southeast Asia.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 75, 106066.
10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.106066

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #SEAArch #Archaeology #MalaysiaArchaeology #milk
  • FORTS, FINDS AND FAST BIKES! ⠀
⠀
Archaeology isn
  • This week in Southeast Asian Archaeology:⠀
⠀
💀 What decades of funerary archaeology can tell us about the changing field of bioarchaeology in Indonesia.⠀
⠀
🏛️ Reconstructing the lost palaces of Lý dynasty Đại Việt—and what archaeology at Thăng Long reveals about their architecture.⠀
⠀
🙏 Two devas at Angkor Thom’s Victory Gate get their heads back, complete with an “eye-opening” ceremony.⠀
⠀
🪨 And the Singapore Stone has become Stoney, an absurdly adorable plushie - I want one.⠀
⠀
All that and much more in this week’s Stones, Skeletons and State Rooms.⠀
⠀
#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Indonesia #Vietnam #Cambodia #Singapore
  • 🏺 CAVES, COMMUNITIES AND CULTURAL MEMORY⠀
⠀
An archaeological site doesn’t stop changing once the excavation ends.⠀
⠀
This week, we look at Ban Chiang through the memories of the people who live there, and at Sri Mahosot, where an ancient landscape remains part of contemporary worship and community identity.⠀
⠀
Also this week:⠀
⠀
🇵🇭 Rescue archaeology at a cave in Romblon⠀
🇮🇩 A possible Kadiri-era site in East Java⠀
🇻🇳 A new forest-and-heritage trail at Mỹ Sơn⠀
🇰🇭 Angkorian Buddhist sculpture⠀
📢 SPAFACON 2027 call for abstracts⠀
💼 New archaeology and heritage jobs⠀
💰 Grants, fellowships and PhD opportunities⠀
⠀
…plus archaeology and heritage stories from across Southeast Asia.⠀
⠀
Caves, Communities and Cultural Memory⠀
Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsletter | 21–27 September 2026⠀
⠀
🔗 Link in bio / southeastasianarchaeology.substack.com⠀
⠀
#Archaeology #SoutheastAsianArchaeology #SoutheastAsia
  • One river in northern Vietnam has yielded a remarkable record of more than 2,000 years of boatbuilding.

From the bed of the Kinh Thầy River at Cầu Bình, researchers documented 23 boat remains, including eight virtually complete logboat hulls and fragments of bows, sterns and planks. Radiocarbon dates place most of them between roughly 700 BCE and 1500 CE. 

Many hulls showed signs of sophisticated work beyond simply hollowing out a tree trunk. The hulls could be widened during manufacture, while wooden thwarts or bulkheads helped maintain their expanded shape. Some boats also carried additional boards along their upper edges, attached through holes with fibre lashings.

Around 2,000 years ago, during the late Đông Sơn and Han periods, several examples reveal another solution: mortise-and-tenon joints locked with wooden dowels. One boat even combined these joints with lashing holes. In later centuries, other Cầu Bình boats were built without this particular system.

This shows that over 2,200 years, boatbuilders used, combined and abandoned different solutions while continuing a long tradition of wooden river craft in the northern Red River Delta.

Reference
Bellwood, Nguyễn, , Lê, Hung, & Calo. 2026. “A 2,200-Year Logboat Sequence (700 BCE–1500 CE) from the Northern Red River Delta, Vietnam.” International Journal of Nautical Archaeology.
DOI: 10.1080/10572414.2026.2717219

#VietnamArchaeology #SoutheastAsianArchaeology #MaritimeArchaeology #NauticalArchaeology #RedRiverDelta
  • 🏺 Palaces, Pots and Porcelain⠀
⠀
Xin Chào! 🇻🇳 It’s a very Vietnam-heavy week in Southeast Asian archaeology: imperial palaces, ceremonial architecture, ancient brick tombs, early tile kilns, Cham heritage and the return of a Đông Sơn bronze drum.⠀
⠀
🔬 New research from Malaysia finds molecular evidence for dairy processing around 3,000 years ago.⠀
⠀
🏺 And in the Philippines, some very unusual earthenware decorated with fragments of Chinese porcelain tells a story about Manila, material culture and the early colonial encounter.⠀
⠀
There’s plenty more from around Southeast Asia in this week’s newsletter.⠀
⠀
Palaces, Pots and Porcelain — read via the link in bio.⠀
⠀
#Archaeology #SoutheastAsianArchaeology #VietnamArchaeology #MalaysiaArchaeology #PhilippineArchaeology
  • A 4.38-metre-long wooden rudder from the west coast of Sumatra is providing a rare glimpse of Southeast Asian seafaring around 1,300 years ago.

The rudder was recovered at the Bongal Site in Central Tapanuli, North Sumatra. Today the site lies inland, but geomorphological research suggests that in the 7th–8th centuries CE it was part of a shallow bay or estuarine environment.

The quarter rudder was carved from a single log and measures 4.38 metres long. Radiocarbon dating of the wood produced a calibrated date of 656–687 CE, making it the earliest securely dated rudder currently known from Southeast Asia.

Researchers also documented hull planks with raised wooden lugs, dowels and surviving palm-fibre ropes. These suggest that parts of these boats were pegged and tied together—a construction method archaeologists call the Southeast Asian lashed-lug tradition. Differences between the surviving planks even suggest that several vessels may have been present. 

Bongal also produced ceramics, glass, beads and coins pointing to connections with much wider exchange networks. The researchers do not argue that the Bongal boats themselves were making long-distance voyages across the Indian Ocean, but propose that locally constructed vessels formed part of a regional maritime network, moving through rivers and along Sumatra’s coast and connecting communities there to broader systems of exchange.

Reference
Mochtar et al. 2026. “Lashed-Lug Boats from the Bongal Site: New Evidence for Early Maritime Networks on the West Coast of Sumatra.” International Journal of Nautical Archaeology.
10.1080/10572414.2026.2714901

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Indonesia #Sumatra #MaritimeArchaeology #NauticalArchaeology
  • Betel, Boats and Border Stones is this week’s Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsletter.⠀
⠀
This issue starts with a fascinating new paper on ancient teeth from South Sulawesi, where unusual dental wear may point to the habitual sucking of whole areca nuts by pre-agricultural foragers.⠀
⠀
Then we move from teeth to timbers: lashed-lug boat remains from Bongal on Sumatra’s west coast, including a 7th-century quarter rudder, add new detail to Southeast Asia’s early maritime networks.⠀
⠀
And yes, there are more boats: Phanom Surin in Thailand and the Butuan boat sites in the Philippines both make appearances this week.⠀
⠀
Plus: Preah Vihear, Koh Ker, Prambanan, Đông Sơn drums, repatriation, digital heritage, and more.⠀
⠀
Read the full issue at the link in bio.⠀
⠀
#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Archaeology #MaritimeArchaeology
  • People in Sulawesi may have been habitually using a neuroactive plant as far back as 25,000–16,000 years ago.

A new study in Science Advances examines two preagricultural foragers from South Sulawesi, Indonesia, separated by thousands of years but sharing an unusual dental pattern: deep, rounded, circumferential wear that does not match ordinary chewing. The researchers argue that the wear formed through repeatedly holding, sucking or gently gnawing a small, hard object in different parts of the mouth. 

Using LC-MS, the team detected arecoline—a characteristic alkaloid of areca, or “betel”, nut—in dental samples from both individuals. One came from Leang Bulu Bettue and dates to 25–16 ka; the other, from Leang Cappalombo 1, is associated with deposits dating to around 7.6–6.3 ka. 

This was probably not betel chewing in the form familiar today. Modern betel quid typically combines processed areca nut with slaked lime and other ingredients. To test whether a simpler practice was plausible, the researchers soaked intact areca nuts and applied the resulting solutions to cells expressing human receptors. The experiments showed that intact nuts could release physiologically active arecoline without slaked lime. Combined with the dental wear, chemical residues and experiments support the authors’ interpretation that these foragers habitually sucked whole areca nuts.

For now, the sample is just two individuals, and psuggestions that the nuts were used for stimulation, pain relief or medicinal purposes remain hypotheses. What the study does show is that habitual neuroactive plant use may reach far deeper into the hunter-gatherer past than the archaeological record had previously demonstrated. 

Reference
Brumm et al. 2026. “Betel nut sucking is the earliest recorded evidence for the habitual use of a neuroactive plant drug.” Science Advances.
10.1126/sciadv.aei1901

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Sulawesi #IndonesiaArchaeology #Prehistory #BetelNut
  • Twenty-two small beads can preserve the traces of a much larger world of movement and exchange.

A new archaeometric study examines beads excavated in 2023 at Khok Phithak, within the ancient city of Khu Bua in Ratchaburi, central Thailand. Khu Bua was an important urban centre associated with the Dvaravatī cultural sphere, enclosed by earthen ramparts and moats and situated within the Mae Klong river system. 

The researchers analysed 21 glass beads and one chalcedony/agate bead, combining microscopic observations with VP-SEM-EDS, LA-ICP-MS and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Manufacturing traces—including axial colour streaks and elongated bubbles—indicate that most of the glass beads were made by drawing glass into tubes or canes before cutting them into individual beads. 

Their chemistry indicates that nineteen beads belong to the m-Na-Al-1 glass subgroup, consistent with glassmaking traditions documented in South Asia, particularly the wider technological sphere of southern India and Sri Lanka. Together with their manufacturing technique, the authors associate these beads with the large-scale Indo-Pacific beadmaking tradition. 

However, one blue bead, B014, is made from plant-ash soda–lime glass with a broad western Asian affinity—although the study cannot identify a specific production centre. Another remarkable bead, B007, appears to have been wound from recycled iron-smelting slag, suggesting an entirely different production history.

Rather than evidence for primary glassmaking at Khu Bua itself, the authors interpret the assemblage as reflecting an inland centre of consumption and possibly redistribution, connected through maritime and riverine networks to much wider systems of Indian Ocean exchange. 

Reference
Risteka et al. 2026. “Production Technology and Provenance of Dvaravatī Glass Beads from Khu Bua, Central Thailand: An Archaeometric Study.” Heritage 9, 347.
10.3390/heritage9090347

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #ThailandArchaeology #Dvaravati #KhuBua #ancienttrade
Wednesday, October 21, 2026
Southeast Asian Archaeology
  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
    • Southeast Asia
    • Mainland Southeast Asia
      • Cambodia
      • Laos
      • Malaysia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
    • Island Southeast Asia
      • Brunei
      • Indonesia
      • Malaysia
      • Philippines
      • Singapore
      • Timor Leste
    • Peripheral Southeast Asia
  • Topics
    • Artifact Type
      • Architecture
      • Bones and Burials
      • Ceramics
      • Intangible Cultural Heritage
      • Lithics
      • Megaliths
      • Rock Art
      • Sculpture
    • Field
      • Anthropology
      • Bioarchaeology
      • Epigraphy
      • General Archaeology
      • Metallurgy and Metalworking
      • Paleontology
      • Underwater Archaeology
      • Visual Art
      • Zooarchaeology
    • Other Themes
      • Animism
      • Buddhism
      • Christianity
      • Disaster Risk Management
      • Hinduism
      • Islam
      • Archaeological Tourism in Southeast Asia
  • Visit
    • Virtual Archaeology
    • Unesco World Heritage
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About
    • Supporters
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Southeast Asian Archaeology
  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
    • Southeast Asia
    • Mainland Southeast Asia
      • Cambodia
      • Laos
      • Malaysia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
    • Island Southeast Asia
      • Brunei
      • Indonesia
      • Malaysia
      • Philippines
      • Singapore
      • Timor Leste
    • Peripheral Southeast Asia
  • Topics
    • Artifact Type
      • Architecture
      • Bones and Burials
      • Ceramics
      • Intangible Cultural Heritage
      • Lithics
      • Megaliths
      • Rock Art
      • Sculpture
    • Field
      • Anthropology
      • Bioarchaeology
      • Epigraphy
      • General Archaeology
      • Metallurgy and Metalworking
      • Paleontology
      • Underwater Archaeology
      • Visual Art
      • Zooarchaeology
    • Other Themes
      • Animism
      • Buddhism
      • Christianity
      • Disaster Risk Management
      • Hinduism
      • Islam
      • Archaeological Tourism in Southeast Asia
  • Visit
    • Virtual Archaeology
    • Unesco World Heritage
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About
    • Supporters
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Southeast Asian Archaeology
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Source: Bangkok Post 20240801

Southeast Asia’s Ruins: The Case for Minimal Restoration

1 August 2024
0
116

...

Source: Vietnam Express 20240731

Hoi An’s Pagoda Bridge Repainted After ‘Too New’ Complaints

1 August 2024
0
76

...

Source: Borneo Post 20240730

Niah Caves to Attract Global Researchers

1 August 2024
0
40

...

Source: Borneo Post 20240730

Sarawak Boosts Niah Tourism After Unesco Recognition

1 August 2024
0
26

...

Popular This Week

  • Southeast Asian Archaeology from a Rock Art Perspective (with annotations)

    Southeast Asian Archaeology from a Rock Art Perspective (with annotations)

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The most influential books on Southeast Asian Archaeology (a crowdsourced list)

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Southeast Asian Archaeology memes that will tickle your funny bone and also make you ponder

    68 shares
    Share 68 Tweet 0
  • Negritos or Malays: Who are the original inhabitants of the Philippines?

    2 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 0
  • Explore Southeast Asia through these virtual galleries

    616 shares
    Share 616 Tweet 0
Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

If you found this site useful, you can help support it by buying me a coffee!

Ayutthaya, Metropolis of the East

7 April 2008
in Thailand
Tags: Ayutthaya (kingdom)Ayutthaya (province)Ayutthaya Historical ParkBaan HollandaChao Phraya RiverDutch East India Company (VOC)muralNarai the Great (person)Unesco World HeritageWat Phanan Choeng (temple)
1
SHARES
182
VIEWS
Ayutthaya, Metropolis of the East

I was in Bangkok last week but I didn’t make the day trip to the former Thai capital of Ayutthaya as planned. Set in an island in the confluence of the Lopburi, Prasak and Chao Praya rivers, Ayutthaya was the capital to the Thai kingdom from the 14th to 18th centuries. It received many foreign visitors, from as far away as Europe and came to be known as the Venice of the East.

Ancient cultural melting pot [Link no longer active]
Bangkok Post, 05 April 2008

Foreigners thrived in Old Ayutthaya

Ayutthaya, the old capital of Siam, is not only important as a World Heritage listed by Unesco but is also a testament of old Siam’s rich cultural diversity.

“Ayutthaya was full of cultural blends among people of many nations and races,” Anek Sihamat, director of the Third Regional Office of Fine Arts, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, said.

According to the director, Ayutthaya was mentioned in Dutch, French and Chinese documents as an inland port city where foreigners could trade with Ayutthaya’s kings via the Phra Khlang department.

Its important exports included forest and wild animal products, deer skins in particular. Outstanding foreign traders included the Dutch United East India Company, or VOC for Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie in Dutch. It brought into Ayutthaya goods, especially pottery, from Japan, China and Europe, and exported Siamese goods from Ayutthaya to Japan, Europe and Batavia.

All foreign settlements, except for some Chinese ones, were situated outside the city walls to the south. The Japanese and Dutch communities were located not far from each other. Opposite the Japanese area stood the Portuguese settlement, which consisted of three churches.

In the north were the Chinese, Makassarese, French and Vietnamese settlements, while the Laotian community was situated in the northeast and the Muslim settlement near the Takhian canal.

However, a number of Chinese were allowed to live inside the city walls near the Makham Riang canal. The Chinese mostly earned their living from selling pork, running liquor factories and making furniture and housewares, the director added.

According to Charnvit Kasetsiri and Michael Wright’s Discovering Ayutthaya, Simon de La Loubere, a French envoy to the Kingdom in the reign of King Narai, recorded, relying on oral accounts, that there were as many as 40 ethnic groups under the Ayutthayan king’s sovereignty.

Dhiravat na Pombejra, leading historian and former history lecturer at Chulalongkorn University’s Faculty of Arts, said the nihon-machi (Japanese village) dates to the late 16th to early 17th centuries. Surrounded by canals on three sides, it ran one kilometre along the river and extended 500 metres inland.

The first Japanese who came to settle in Siam were either Roman Catholics fleeing persecution, or so-called ronin, samurai who had lost their masters during the civil wars that ended in victory for the Tokugawa family at the Battle of Sekigahara (1600).

Like other foreign settlements in and around Ayutthaya, the Japanese settlement was a separate village governed by its own leader (or nai). Many Japanese became mercenaries in the service of the kings of Siam.

The most famous of the Japanese mercenary leaders in Ayutthaya was Yamada Nagamasa, who received the rank and title of Okya Senaphimuk from the Siamese king. He and his followers played a crucial role in the fierce succession conflicts that took place from 1628 to 1629 and led to the usurpation of the throne by Okya Kalahom, or King Prasat Thong, who reigned from 1629 to 1656.

In his Diary of the Picnic Incident, Jeremias van Vliet, then director of VOC’s Siam factory, wrote about “pressure from these bald-headed villains”, referring to the Japanese samurai.

According to van Vliet’s Description of the Kingdom of Siam 1638, King Prasat Thong, who once cracked down on the Japanese community in Ayutthaya, called those who had fled away back again after a short time in fear of their revenge. And when their number rose to between 70 and 80, the king gave them a fine tract of land to live on and bestowed titles of honour on the three most prominent Japanese, appointed these men as chiefs over the others, and placed them under one of his mandarins.

In late 1636, there were still about 70 to 80 samurai, whom the king employed as mercenaries, living in Ayutthaya’s Japanese quarter, which adjoined the VOC compound. Most of the samurai had Siamese wives, with whom they had children. And since there were also some Japanese merchants residing in Ayutthaya, the total population of the Japanese quarter may have been about 400 to 550 (see van Vliet’s Siam by Chris Baker, Dhiravat na Pombejra, Alfons van der Kraan and David K. Wyatt).

Dhiravat added that the Japanese intermarried with locals, and soon the community was predominantly mestizo. A famous Luso-Japanese mestizo was Maria Pina de Guimar, who married Greek adventurer Constantine Phaulkon in the 1680s.

Opposite the Japanese village stood the Portuguese settlement, overlooking the Chao Phraya River on the west and having canals on the other three sides. Covering an area of over half a square kilometre, the settlement had three churches of three Catholic orders: The Franciscans in the north of the settlement, the Dominicans in the centre and the Jesuits to the south.

Dhiravat said that the Portuguese settled in Siam in the first half of the 16th century, not long after first arriving to trade with Siam from 1510 to 1511. The Portuguese not only traded there but also became much in demand as mercenaries, thanks to their knowledge of firearms and modern warfare.

Apparently, the land of the Portuguese settlement was granted to the Portuguese as a reward for their help for King Chairacha, who reigned from 1534 to 1547, in the battle of Chiang Kran. During that campaign, according to Portuguese traveller Fernao Mendes Pinto, 120 Portuguese fought for the Siamese king.

In the mid-16th century, there were around 130 Portuguese in Ayutthaya. However, the population of the Portuguese settlement must have grown as more mestizo children were born. By the late 17th century Nicolas Gervaise, a French priest, reported that there were 700 to 800 households in the Portuguese camp, and Father Tachard was told by Constantine Phaulkon that there were in 1685 a little over 4,000 people in the Portuguese settlement. In Thai history, the Portuguese are famous not only for their ships, guns and soldiers but also for their introduction into Siamese cuisine egg-based desserts such as foi thong by Maria Guimar.

The ruins of the Dominican church of St Peter and St Paul, also called Sao Domingos, were excavated by the Fine Arts Department in the mid-1980s with funding from the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon. Many skeletons, coins, rosaries, crucifixes and Dutch clay pipes were found during the excavations. There used to be three churches in all in the Portuguese village, but the Dominican church is the only one that has been excavated.

The skeletons uncovered were mostly those of mestizos from intermarriages. The Portuguese stayed long in Siam, from the early 16th century until the fall of Ayutthaya in 1767. Some Portuguese were even taken to Burma as hostages by the Burmese invaders. The rest followed King Taksin the Great to settle down in Thon Buri, Dhiravat added.

Historian Bulong Srikanok of the Fine Arts Department said that the Portuguese language was used as the official language for trade and diplomacy by the Siamese from the reign of King Ramathibodi II (1491 to 1529) until Siam signed the Burney Treaty with Britain in 1826. That treaty was in three languages – Portuguese, Chinese and English.

According to her, all high-level officials in Ayutthaya could use the Portuguese language fluently.

Father Tachard, who came with the French mission, reported that Siamese nobles were able to converse in Portuguese. During their voyage to Siam, the French Jesuits spent eight months learning Portuguese so that they could communicate directly with the Siamese nobles.

As Portugal was believed to have adopted a policy to convert the Siamese through intermarriages, there were many mestizos born to Portuguese fathers and Mon, Siamese or Chinese mothers in Ayutthaya. After the fall of Ayutthaya, many of their descendants settled in an area of Thon Buri called Kudijeen and worked as Thai-Portuguese translators for the state until the Bangkok period. These translators were called Lam Kudijeen, Bulong added.

By the river on a private-owned dockyard in Tambon Klong Suan Phlu, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya district, once stood the Dutch settlement.

As part of the celebrations marking 400 years of Dutch-Thai relations (1604 to 2004), the Fine Arts Department began an archaeological excavation in the area in October 2003, and found traces of the main building, ceramic shards (Chinese, Vietnamese, Siamese), glassware, Dutch pipes, Chinese coins, cowrie shells and many other items.

Dhiravat said that this site was the Dutch United East India Company’s trading agency from around 1635 to 1765. The land was given to the Dutch in 1634 by King Prasat Thong as a reward for having helped Ayutthaya fight Pattani.

The Dutch first came to Ayutthaya in 1604, hoping for passage to China on a Siamese ship. Although disappointed in this matter, the Dutch stayed on in Ayutthaya, opening a factorij (trading company) in 1608.

Importing silver, Indian textiles and other goods, the Dutch United East India Company, or VOC, exported from Siam forest produce, such as deer skins, sapan wood (a dyewood), eagle wood (an aromatic wood), ivory, wax and benzoin, along with rice, tin and ray skins.

According to a journal kept by Dutch doctor Gijsbert Heecq (or Heeck), in 1655 the Dutch lodge or factorij comprised several buildings, storehouses or godowns, a garden and a graveyard. The head of the Dutch settlement at any given time was of course the head merchant, or opperhoofd, of the VOC trading office in Ayutthaya.

The employees of the VOC lived with local women (mainly Mons), and the Dutch settlement, like other foreign communities in Ayutthaya, came to have a strong mestizo element. Problems concerning mestizo children turned into legal problems in Ayutthaya, leading to the Tra Sam Duang (Three Seals) Law which banned Siamese Buddhist, Laotian and Mon women from marrying Westerners, Muslims and Malaccans. However, enforcement was ineffective. No women were punished for violating the law, Dhiravat said.

According to Dirk van der Cruysse’s Siam & The West 1500-1700, King Narai refused to consent to the departure of children born of Dutch fathers and Siamese mothers, holding that they were his subjects; he only allowed the departure of children under seven years of age.

Dhiravat added that the Dutch stayed longer than the French and other foreigners since they focused on trade. They even offered space on their ships to send Siamese monks to help ease the Buddhist crisis in Sri Lanka. This was recorded in some Dutch papers.

However, there was a scandal involving the Dutch in Ayutthaya. It was called the Picnic Incident.

According to van Vliet’s Report and Historical Account of the Events, on December 16, 1636, a group of Dutchmen sailed past the king’s palace and breached the palace’s safety rules. They continued to party at the sacred Wat Boeretiet (Vorachet). Some of them later scolded and hit a servant of the prince, and entered a house of sick Siamese and stole their food.

When King Prasat Thong learned about the incident, he was outraged and ordered all those Dutchmen arrested and stomped to death by elephants. Thereafter, trading activities between Ayutthaya and the VOC became restricted.

On the bank of the Chao Phraya River outside the city walls to the south stood the French settlement. It was bordered by Khlong Takhian on the west and Wat Phutthaisawan on the east.

Dhiravat said that the first Roman Catholic church on this site was built in the 1660s, on land given to the French Society of Foreign Missions (Societe des Missions Etrangeres) by King Narai (1656 to 1688).

According to him, the Paris-based Society’s vicars-apostolic Bishops Pierre Lambert de la Motte and Francois Pallu arrived in Siam in 1662 and 1664 respectively. They were warmly welcomed by King Narai, who wanted to learn about France, European politics, the court of King Louis XIV and the Christian religion. They therefore decided to stay on and found a mission in Siam with the aim of educating Asians so that they could be ordained and thus work.

The community of French priests was small, but their parishioners and students were Tonkin and Cochinchinese Vietnamese, Chinese, Mons and a few Siamese.

During the Burmese invasion of 1765 to 1767, this area (also called Ban or Bang Plahet) was used as a camp, and was destroyed by the invaders even before the fall of Ayutthaya itself. The church was rebuilt in the reign of King Mongkut in the mid-19th century. The present Victorian-style building dates from the reign of King Chulalongkorn, when St Joseph’s was rebuilt again on the initiative of the French vicar apostolic at that time, Bishop Jean-Louis Vey, and consecrated in 1891. There is still an important Roman Catholic school on the site.

According to Discovering Ayutthaya, there was an English settlement in Ayutthaya. In 1612, King Song Tham granted officers of the British East India Company a large building on the bank of the Chao Phraya River south of the Dutch settlement. Despite support from the king, the company eventually suffered great losses and finally had to withdraw since some British agents tended to trade on their own account.

In Ayutthaya, there were accounts of different groups of Muslims, namely, Moors, Arabs, Persians, Indians, Chams, Makassarese, Malays, Javanese and people from Pattani in the South. They were under the Phra Khlang department that dealt with traders from the “Indic” world. The Muslims were collectively referred to as khaek.

Around Wat Phananchoeng, one of the oldest temples in Ayutthaya, there used to be a large Chinese settlement. It is where the Pak Sak and Chao Phraya rivers join. In the Ayutthaya period, Chinese junks usually anchored in front of this temple.

In the 17th century, many Chinese settled around this temple.

Like many other foreigners, they married Mon women in Ayutthaya, who were rather strong and independent, said Dhiravat.

Anek Sihamat, director of the Third Regional Office of Fine Arts, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, believed that many foreigners settled down in Ayutthaya due to the Ayutthayan kings’ open-door policy to promote trade.

Certain pieces of art in Ayutthaya reflect foreign influence, such as murals depicting the Chinese in Wat Rajaburana, some Buddha statues with Chinese inscriptions and some Western and Persian-style buildings dating to the reign of King Narai (1656 to 1688), he added.

Anuje Sirikit, a member of the National Museum Volunteers group, said during the recent NMV excursion to foreign settlements in Ayutthaya, “The more I learn about the foreign settlements in Ayutthaya, the more my heart is open to cultural diversity.”

Subscribe to the weekly Southeast Asian Archaeology news digest

Latest Books

The following are affiliate links for which I may earn a commission if you click and make a purchase. Click here for more books about Southeast Asian archaeology.
Sale Malay Silver and Gold: Courtly Splendour from Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei and Thailand
Malay Silver and Gold: Courtly Splendour from...
Amazon Prime
$38.54
Buy on Amazon
Sale The Oxford Guide to the Malayo-Polynesian Languages of Southeast Asia (Oxford Guides to the World's Languages)
The Oxford Guide to the Malayo-Polynesian...
Amazon Prime
$165.87
Buy on Amazon
Sale Majapahit: Sculptures from a Forgotten Kingdom
Majapahit: Sculptures from a Forgotten Kingdom
$44.08
Buy on Amazon
Sale Majapahit: Intrigue, Betrayal and War in Indonesia’s Greatest Empire
Majapahit: Intrigue, Betrayal and War in...
Amazon Prime
$15.74
Buy on Amazon
Sale The Story of Southeast Asia
The Story of Southeast Asia
$24.11
Buy on Amazon
Buddhist Landscapes: Art and Archaeology of the Khorat Plateau, 7th to 11th Centuries
Buddhist Landscapes: Art and Archaeology of the...
Amazon Prime
$56.00
Buy on Amazon

Comments 1

  1. ksap says:
    18 years ago

    very good<<<!!
    I lik3 That!!!**/* ^^
    🙂 ))

    Th@Nl<$$$ @lot!!!

    I+ he|P M3 muchhhhh FOl2 MY WORl>>> ^o^
    F0|2 ALL.::…. =_= ;PPP*

    +H@N|<<<<<SSSSSSS ^^”

    ^__________________________^

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Southeast Asian Archaeology

© 2019

Navigate Site

  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
  • Topics
  • Visit
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About

Follow

Never Miss a Discovery
Subscribe for Exclusive Southeast Asian Archaeology News!

Stay connected with the latest breakthroughs, research, and events from across Southeast Asia’s archaeology scene. Sign up today for exclusive weekly updates, trusted by over 2,000 subscribers.

×
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
    • Southeast Asia
    • Mainland Southeast Asia
      • Cambodia
      • Laos
      • Malaysia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
    • Island Southeast Asia
      • Brunei
      • Indonesia
      • Malaysia
      • Philippines
      • Singapore
      • Timor Leste
    • Peripheral Southeast Asia
  • Topics
    • Artifact Type
      • Architecture
      • Bones and Burials
      • Ceramics
      • Intangible Cultural Heritage
      • Lithics
      • Megaliths
      • Rock Art
      • Sculpture
    • Field
      • Anthropology
      • Bioarchaeology
      • Epigraphy
      • General Archaeology
      • Metallurgy and Metalworking
      • Paleontology
      • Underwater Archaeology
      • Visual Art
      • Zooarchaeology
    • Other Themes
      • Animism
      • Buddhism
      • Christianity
      • Disaster Risk Management
      • Hinduism
      • Islam
      • Archaeological Tourism in Southeast Asia
  • Visit
    • Virtual Archaeology
    • Unesco World Heritage
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About
    • Supporters
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2019

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.