• Can inscriptions help reconstruct how a kingdom expanded across a landscape?

King Citrasena (Chitrasen, later known as Mahendravarman) ruled Chenla in the late 6th to early 7th centuries, during a period when Chenla’s influence was extending across parts of what are now Cambodia, Laos and northeastern Thailand. His reign is known partly through inscriptions recording religious foundations, royal achievements and other acts of authority. 

Pailoplee and Khatshima map 21 inscriptions from at least 19 locations associated with Citrasena, and asked if people were moving between these places, which routes would they have taken? To explore this, they use Least Cost Path (LCP) modelling in a GIS. LCP calculates routes that minimise the “cost” of movement across terrain.

In archaeology, this can help identify plausible corridors shaped by features such as slopes, river valleys and mountain barriers. These models show how movement could have been structured by the landscape under the assumptions of the model.

Across several scenarios, the reconstructed paths repeatedly concentrate around major river systems—especially the Mun River—and particular passes through the Phnom Dong Rek (Dangrek) mountain range. The authors also compare the modelled network with archaeological sites attributed to Citrasena’s period, many of which fall along these reconstructed corridors.

Where river navigation would have been difficult (such as the Khone Phapheng Falls), the authors propose that Citrasena’s forces may instead have moved overland along riverbanks, using waterways as natural guides through the landscape.

The placement of several inscriptions near river confluences also suggests that these locations may have been important for controlling movement, communication and exchange, not simply access to water.

Reference
Pailoplee, S. & Khatshima, K. 2026. “The role of King Chitrasen (Mahendravarman) in the expansion of the Chenla Kingdom: A study of inscriptions and historical geography.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 14, 103503.
10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103503

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Cambodia #Thailand #Laos #Chenla
  • Sometimes the biggest archaeological questions depend on evidence we cannot see during excavation.

Microarchaeology investigates archaeological deposits at microscopic and microstratigraphic scales. In Southeast Asia, this can be especially valuable because monsoonal wetness, tropical weathering, intensive land use and complex depositional histories can affect how archaeological evidence survives. 

Researchers can examine the surrounding sediment for traces of past activity and later disturbance. Methods discussed in this new paper include sediment micromorphology, laboratory micro-excavation, high-resolution imaging, FTIR microscopy and SEM-EDS. Depending on the context, microscopic evidence can help identify burning, trampling, plant processing, sediment movement and environmental change. 

The importance of that context is illustrated by work in northern Laos. At Tam Ngu Hao 2, microstratigraphy was used alongside lithological observations and dating to establish the stratigraphic context of Denisovan fossil evidence. At Tam Pà Ling, it has shown potential for investigating environmental seasonality and possible patterns of early modern human presence. These methods help archaeologists understand what happened to a deposit before drawing conclusions from what it contains.
 
The paper also introduces the Australian Microarchaeology and Palaeosciences Facility (AusMAP) and argues for greater collaboration, training and locally based microarchaeological expertise across Southeast Asia. 

Reference:
Hernandez et al. 2026. Scaling down to look further back: Southeast Asia, deep-time science and microarchaeology. SPAFA Journal 10.
10.26721/spafajournal.651369a4y8 

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Archaeology #Microarchaeology #Geoarchaeology #ArchaeologicalScience
  • This week on Southeast Asian Archaeology: claims, contexts and careful reading.⠀
⠀
With Malaysia’s National Day, Vietnam’s National Day, Timor-Leste’s Popular Consultation Day, and International Literacy Day all close together, I’m thinking about literacy not just as reading words, but reading evidence: museum labels, old spellings, dates, maps, artefacts, archives, and the occasional viral post with a raised eyebrow.⠀
⠀
The catalyst this week is the recent controversy over historical claims in Malaysia, alongside a timely RSIS piece on how historians, archaeologists, archivists, librarians and curators can help push back against disinformation. Not by attacking people, but by helping everyone ask better questions of the past.⠀
⠀
Also in this week’s issue: Penang’s historical Malay spellings, Cambodia’s new artefact database grant, Singapore’s revised History Gallery, UNESCO’s maritime museum project, new research on Sundadonty, Roti Island, Chenla inscriptions, ancient Myanmar, and more.⠀
⠀
Link in bio.⠀
⠀
#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Archaeology #Heritage #InformationLiteracy
  • How old are the rock paintings of Mainland Southeast Asia? 🎨🪨

A new study from Mangguan in Yunnan, southwestern China, provides another important piece of the puzzle.

Using uranium-thorium dating, researchers analysed tiny calcite deposits that had formed over the paintings. Because the calcite must be younger than the pigment underneath, the dates provide a minimum age for the art. One deposit covering a human figure shows that the painting was already there at least 4,220 years ago.

Mangguan is particularly interesting because it lies only about 15 km from the better-known Cangyuan rock art complex. The two have stylistic similarities and overlapping dates, suggesting they formed part of a broader regional rock art tradition, a comparison can be taken farther south.

The rock paintings at Pha Taem in Luang Prabang, Laos, have previously been compared with Cangyuan, raising intriguing questions about relationships between the rock art traditions of southwestern China and Mainland Southeast Asia.

Most rock art in Mainland Southeast Asia remains poorly dated, so dates like those from Mangguan give us increasingly useful chronological anchors for thinking about these connections.

References:
Wu, Y. et al. 2026. U-Th dating of rock paintings in southwestern China: minimum age of ~4.2 ka BP at the Mangguan site. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 74, 105987. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105987.

Bo, X. 2020. On the relationship between the Cangyuan rock art in Yunnan, China, and the Pha Taem rock art in Laos. Rock Art Research 37(2).

Tan, N.H. 2018. The Cliff Paintings of Pha Taem, Luang Prabang, Lao PDR. Rock Art Research 35(1).

#RockArt #SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Yunnan #China
  • Extraordinary claims about the past can be exciting. But how do we tell an exciting new hypothesis from pseudoarchaeology?

Recent controversy in Malaysia over claims that ancient Malays taught the Romans shipbuilding provides a useful case study. Rather than piling on the person behind the claims, I think there is a more useful question to ask: how would we actually test an idea like this?

Archaeology gives us some simple tools.

Do the dates work? What is the primary evidence? Does the evidence actually demonstrate the connection being claimed? Are there better explanations? And perhaps most importantly: what evidence would make us reject the hypothesis?

Ancient Southeast Asians really were sophisticated seafarers. Srivijaya really was one of Asia’s great maritime powers. Sungai Batu really does preserve remarkable evidence for early iron production.

None of those achievements needs embellishment to make Southeast Asian archaeology extraordinary.

Swipe through for five questions you can use the next time you encounter an astonishing claim about the ancient past.

🚩 Remember: possibility is not evidence, similarity does not necessarily mean transmission, and extraordinary claims still have to survive ordinary archaeological scrutiny.

Read more about the archaeology behind these claims in this week’s Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsletter.

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Pseudoarchaeology #Malaysia #MaritimeArchaeology #MediaLiteracy
  • A 4,000-year-old painted stone from Wetar Island may change how we understand the Austronesian story.⠀
⠀
Archaeologists excavating Huknaur 1 in Southeast Indonesia found a painted plaque with a red sun-ray motif linked to the Austronesian Painting Tradition — a wider visual tradition known from eastern Indonesia and nearby islands.⠀
⠀
What makes this find so important is that the plaque appears to be older than the first pottery at the site. That means a shared symbolic tradition may have been present before the full Neolithic package usually associated with Austronesian expansion. This discovery suggests that ideas, symbols, and identity may have travelled ahead of pottery.⠀
⠀
It is a reminder that the spread of people goes beyond tools, crops, or ceramics, and may also have been about belief, belonging, and a shared visual language carried across the sea.⠀
⠀
Swipe through to see why this small object has such big implications.⠀
⠀
Reference:⠀
O’Connor, S., Kealy, S., Kaharudin, H.A.F., et al. (2026). 4000-year-old painted plaque from Southeast Indonesia reveals Austronesian Painting Tradition preceded Neolithic pottery. PNAS 123(34): e2611580123.⠀
⠀
#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #RockArt #Austronesian #Indonesia #Wetar #SoutheastAsia #IslandSoutheastAsia #AustronesianPaintingTradition
  • Plaques, Ponds and Provenance⠀
⠀
This week’s newsletter begins with a 4,000-year-old painted plaque from Wetar Island — a small object with a big story.⠀
⠀
The plaque carries a red sun-like motif linked to the Austronesian Painting Tradition, and it appears before pottery at the site. That suggests visual symbols and shared ideas may have moved through maritime Southeast Asia before some of the usual archaeological markers we associate with Austronesian expansion.⠀
⠀
Also this week: archaeology beneath Angkor’s Sras Srang, suspected Ban Chiang artefacts offered for return from Switzerland, and more heritage news from across the region.⠀
⠀
Link in bio.
  • How do you make a 3-metre stone stand upright for centuries?

At Hintang in northern Laos, archaeologists are beginning to answer that question.

In 2025, a Lao-Australian team excavated Site 7A — the first excavation at a Hintang standing-stone site in around 90 years. Beneath the surface, they found that the stones had been set deeply into pits, with smaller rocks packed around their bases to stabilise them. Roughly one-third of each standing stone was buried underground.

One big question remains, though — how old are the Hintang stones?

Samples were collected for dating, but those results are still being analysed. So, for now, we understand a little more about how these monuments were built.

📖 Shewan, L., O’Reilly, D., Armstrong, B. & Butphachit, A. (2026). “Surveys of Hintang standing stone sites and excavations at Site 7A, Houaphanh, Lao PDR.” Antiquity.
doi: 10.15184/aqy.2026.10408

#Archaeology #SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Laos #Megaliths #Hintang #AncientTechnology #ArchaeologicalResearch #Heritage #NewResearch
  • Angkor’s water system is famous for its scale: enormous reservoirs, long canals, and monumental engineering.⠀
⠀
New research by archaeologist Sarah Klassen highlights how Angkor’s agricultural system also depended on more than 1,000 local temple communities spread across the Greater Angkor Region. These communities helped organise labour, manage local water systems, and coordinate rice production - and suggests that Angkor’s success was built through a combination of top-down and bottom-up management.⠀
⠀
The state created the large hydraulic framework. Local communities adapted to it, expanded around it, and helped make the wider agricultural landscape function.⠀
⠀
Over time, however, this balance changed. Land and resources became increasingly concentrated, the system became more centralised, and some of the flexibility that had helped Angkor cope with earlier environmental stress may have been lost.⠀
⠀
Beyond its temples and kings, Angkor
  • New Evidence from the Southeast Asian Borderlands⠀
⠀
This week in Southeast Asian Archaeology: new dates, new methods, and some wonderfully untidy timelines.⠀
⠀
🪨 Uranium-thorium dating pushes the Mangguan rock paintings in Yunnan back to at least 4,220 years ago⠀
 🥁 AI-assisted restoration takes on damaged imagery on Guangxi bronze drums⠀
 🌾 New work at Angkor asks how infrastructure, local communities and water management shaped resilience⠀
 🗿 Lao-Australian fieldwork maps and excavates the enigmatic Hintang standing stones⠀
⠀
Plus archaeology and heritage news from across Southeast Asia, new research, opportunities, and more.⠀
⠀
I’ve also started experimenting with short visual explainers of new archaeology papers here on Instagram — so follow along if you like your archaeology with fewer footnotes and more pixels.⠀
⠀
Read the latest SEAArch newsletter via the link in bio.⠀
⠀
#Archaeology #SoutheastAsianArchaeology #SoutheastAsia #RockArt #Angkor #Laos #Yunnan #Heritage #ArchaeologicalResearch #DigitalHeritage
Sunday, September 6, 2026
Southeast Asian Archaeology
  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
    • Southeast Asia
    • Mainland Southeast Asia
      • Cambodia
      • Laos
      • Malaysia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
    • Island Southeast Asia
      • Brunei
      • Indonesia
      • Malaysia
      • Philippines
      • Singapore
      • Timor Leste
    • Peripheral Southeast Asia
  • Topics
    • Artifact Type
      • Architecture
      • Bones and Burials
      • Ceramics
      • Intangible Cultural Heritage
      • Lithics
      • Megaliths
      • Rock Art
      • Sculpture
    • Field
      • Anthropology
      • Bioarchaeology
      • Epigraphy
      • General Archaeology
      • Metallurgy and Metalworking
      • Paleontology
      • Underwater Archaeology
      • Visual Art
      • Zooarchaeology
    • Other Themes
      • Animism
      • Buddhism
      • Christianity
      • Disaster Risk Management
      • Hinduism
      • Islam
      • Archaeological Tourism in Southeast Asia
  • Visit
    • Virtual Archaeology
    • Unesco World Heritage
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About
    • Supporters
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Southeast Asian Archaeology
  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
    • Southeast Asia
    • Mainland Southeast Asia
      • Cambodia
      • Laos
      • Malaysia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
    • Island Southeast Asia
      • Brunei
      • Indonesia
      • Malaysia
      • Philippines
      • Singapore
      • Timor Leste
    • Peripheral Southeast Asia
  • Topics
    • Artifact Type
      • Architecture
      • Bones and Burials
      • Ceramics
      • Intangible Cultural Heritage
      • Lithics
      • Megaliths
      • Rock Art
      • Sculpture
    • Field
      • Anthropology
      • Bioarchaeology
      • Epigraphy
      • General Archaeology
      • Metallurgy and Metalworking
      • Paleontology
      • Underwater Archaeology
      • Visual Art
      • Zooarchaeology
    • Other Themes
      • Animism
      • Buddhism
      • Christianity
      • Disaster Risk Management
      • Hinduism
      • Islam
      • Archaeological Tourism in Southeast Asia
  • Visit
    • Virtual Archaeology
    • Unesco World Heritage
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About
    • Supporters
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Southeast Asian Archaeology
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Source: Vietnam Net 20240729

Vietnam Unveils Stamps Featuring Ceramic National Treasures

31 July 2024
0
65

...

Source: China Daily 20240711

[Video] Changsha Ware: Tang Dynasty’s Global Maritime Trade

18 July 2024
0
71

...

Source: Manila Standard 20240709

Ecuador Gifts 5,500-Year-Old Cacao Bottle Replica to Philippines

18 July 2024
0
17

...

Source: Vietnam Plus 20240701

Champa Relic Site Yields Rare Buddha Statue

3 July 2024
0
64

...

Popular This Week

  • Southeast Asian Archaeology memes that will tickle your funny bone and also make you ponder

    Southeast Asian Archaeology memes that will tickle your funny bone and also make you ponder

    68 shares
    Share 68 Tweet 0
  • The most influential books on Southeast Asian Archaeology (a crowdsourced list)

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Southeast Asian Archaeology from a Rock Art Perspective (with annotations)

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • [Paper] Early Metal Age Settlement at the Site of Palemba, Kalumpang, Karama Valley, West Sulawesi

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Negritos or Malays: Who are the original inhabitants of the Philippines?

    2 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 0
Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

If you found this site useful, you can help support it by buying me a coffee!

Vietnamese collector talks about his antiques

15 October 2007
in Vietnam
Tags: ceramicscollectorDuong Phu Hien (person)Tang Dynasty (kingdom)Thang Long Antique Association
0
SHARES
250
VIEWS
Vietnamese collector talks about his antiques

13 October 2007 (Viet Nam Net Bridge) – A feature on a longtime Vietnamese collector of antiques, whose single pieces are worth up to a quarter of a million dollars.

The owner of nonpareil antiques
by Tuoi Tre

He is not even known by many antique collectors, but anyone who had a chance to see part of Duong Phu Hien’s huge antique collection would be shocked by the value.

The house of collector Duong Phu Hien is full of antiques, from the basement to the top, but the owner is very modest and doesn’t like to boast about the collection. It was very hard for a Tuoi Tre reporter to get access to Mr. Hien’s collection and to know about his most valuable collection of ceramics. Mr. Hien said that those antiques (ceramic-sekeleton pottery items with the colour of green beetle or do luc in Vietnamese) are treasures of treasures.


The treasure

Do luc pottery appeared in the Duong Dynasty of China and this kind of pottery existed from the 9th to 12th centuries only. The secret of making the enamel and the skeleton of do luc potterry has been lost. As a result, do luc pottery items are very rare in the world and they are very, very expensive in the antique market.

Mr. Hien began collecting do luc pottery accidentally. In 1972, when he was a young officer, on his way through Vinh town in central Vietnam, he saw workers at a construction site excavating many broken pottery items while they were digging a foundation. He asked for half of a bowl, which has fanciful green enamel and is very light. Since then he has collected do luc pottery.

His friends know Mr. Hien’s passion for pottery with green enamel so whenever they see such pottery items, they immediately tell him.

The collector bought his first complete do luc pottery item in 1987 for $2,000, during a trip to Kim Boi in the northern province of Hoa Binh. That’s a big bowl with a water-lily pattern made during the Ly Dynasty. This bowl is a heavy skeleton pottery item, which is easier to make and not as old as the do luc pottery with light skeletons.

When he lent this bowl to an exhibition at the Louvre Museum in France, someone offered to buy it for $250,000. But this antique is a very, very small part of his huge collection of do luc pottery, at 350 items. Mr. Hien has refused offers to purchase all of those things.

In his collection of do luc pottery, Mr. Hien loves a wine cup dating back to the Duong Dynasty in the 9th century the most. He said that the beauty of that small cup can’t be described by words. That beauty is only felt by touching and looking at the cup.

The ancient wine cup is 5cm in height, 2.5cm in diameter at the bottom and 8cm in diameter at the top, with green beetle enamel outside and yellow enamel inside, with daisy patterns.

Early this year, a Taiwanese collector met Mr. Hien and asked to buy that cup for $28 million, but Mr. Hien refused, considering it a national treasure.

The second famous do luc pottery item of this antique collector is a duck-shaped wine jar, also with a light skeleton. A Taiwanese collector also wanted to buy that item for $2 million.

Another item that he also loves is a water jar, which he bought last Tet for $100,000. This jar has been appraised for around $1 million by a foreign antique collector in Asia Art magazine.

To make social value for antiques

Mr. Hien allowed Tuoi Tre’s reporter to take photos of the collection of do luc pottery and he talked about this collection.

In the four-storey house which is full of antiques, where the owner has a very modest space to breath, there are over 100 Buddhist statues made of gold from Tibet and vu huong wood, bronze drums, 400 lime-pots of a thousand years old, royal robes of the Thanh Dynasty in China. All of those antiques are worthy to go to light to be admired by people of the current time.

The owner of that treasure wavers between publicising his collection, the fruit of three generations of his family, and hiding it to not attract public attention and not to be bothered.

The establishment of private museums in Vietnam has been ‘protected’ by the Heritage Law but collectors still hesitate. The established private museums don’t have really valuable items while the largest collectors don’t want to show their collections.

Big antique collectors still worry about opening their collections for many reasons. The largest reason is that the pioneers are always affected the most. They worry they will be asked about the origin of antiques. It is really difficult to explain about that when there is collector who can exchange a big house for a pair of jars.

The second reason is difficulties associated with housing. All collectors in Vietnam are now living with antiques. Though they are considered to be rich, it is still very difficult to have areas that are large enough to display antiques.

If the two above issues are solved, Vietnam will have many more private museums.

Do you worry that you will be questioned about the origin, the price, etc. of your antiques so you don’t want to make public your collections?

The habit of collecting antiques has been in existence for thousands of years. Collecting antiques is not simply spending a great amount of money to buy an antique, but nurturing the mind. Social change over time has affected the habit of collecting antiques in Vietnam

I think there are three kinds of antique collectors in Vietnam. The first is the group of collectors who have real passion for antiques and collect antiques from generation to generation, systematically, scientically and methodocally. (I rank myself in this category).

The second type is the group of people who have deep knowledge of and passion for antiques but don’t have means to collect them (archaeologists, history professors).

The third is the group of collectors – traders (the biggest group of collectors). We should not look down on them because they contribute to socialise antiques but sometimes because of money, their antiques are not authentic, which affects the prestige of Vietnamese antiques in the world.

I think that people maybe don’t know but in the circle of collectors, we know the level of antiques of each owner and each antique has its story and history.

My family has collected antiques for three generations. My grandfather is a physician, my father is a teacher and though we are rich or poor, we all have the same passion for antiques. I have exchanged antiques, which are worth millions of US dollars at present, for 100kg of cassava. I even exchanged tens of normal ceramic bowls for tens of ancient bowls. An object is valuable to one who knows its value and can be satisfied by it.

When will you introduce your invaluable collections to the public?

We, I and collectors in the Thang Long Antique Association, are preparing for a great exhibition on the occasion of the 1,000th anniversary of Thang Long-Hanoi capital. We want to gradually bring antiques to the public. I hope that I can open a real museum, not for myself only, in the future, perhaps during the 1,000th anniversary of Thang Long-Hanoi.


Related Books:
– South-East Asian Ceramics: Thai, Khmer, and Vietnamese From the Collection of the Art Gallery of South Australia, Adelaide (Asia Collection) by D. Richards
– The Ceramics of Southeast Asia : Their Dating and Identification by R. M. Brown
– Vietnamese Ceramics: A Separate Tradition by J. Stevensen, J. Guy and L. A. Cort

Subscribe to the weekly Southeast Asian Archaeology news digest

Latest Books

The following are affiliate links for which I may earn a commission if you click and make a purchase. Click here for more books about Southeast Asian archaeology.
Sale Malay Silver and Gold: Courtly Splendour from Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei and Thailand
Malay Silver and Gold: Courtly Splendour from...
Amazon Prime
$38.54
Buy on Amazon
Sale The Oxford Guide to the Malayo-Polynesian Languages of Southeast Asia (Oxford Guides to the World's Languages)
The Oxford Guide to the Malayo-Polynesian...
Amazon Prime
$165.87
Buy on Amazon
Sale Majapahit: Sculptures from a Forgotten Kingdom
Majapahit: Sculptures from a Forgotten Kingdom
$44.08
Buy on Amazon
Sale Majapahit: Intrigue, Betrayal and War in Indonesia’s Greatest Empire
Majapahit: Intrigue, Betrayal and War in...
Amazon Prime
$15.74
Buy on Amazon
Sale The Story of Southeast Asia
The Story of Southeast Asia
$24.11
Buy on Amazon
Buddhist Landscapes: Art and Archaeology of the Khorat Plateau, 7th to 11th Centuries
Buddhist Landscapes: Art and Archaeology of the...
Amazon Prime
$56.00
Buy on Amazon

Comments 7

  1. Stephanie D. Fullerton says:
    19 years ago

    I have a vase of sorts… that was sent to me from Vietnam in 1970 to the US. It was found buried there in vietnam.
    The vase is yellowish in color with a dragon etched into the glaze and a signature of the artist. It stands approximately 14-16 inches high the glaze is yellow and lumpy in appearance. the top of the vase is about 5-6 inches at it’s opening and has four loops with etching on thise bases attached to the top as if for carrying the vase. Do you have any info for me? I could send you a photo of it as well.
    Thank you ,
    Stephanie Fullerton.

  2. Greg oram says:
    16 years ago

    I have two yellow vases with black dragons and sun signs that that came out of so. Vietnam in 1975 from a museum that was going to be destroyed by No. Vietnam an brought to the USA. Looking for info on vases maybe looking for a buyer, have pictures if interested. email me soon

  3. Huguette Carlson says:
    16 years ago

    I have a satsuma bucket form vase, i suspect from researching that it could be from late 1800 to 1910, it has a japanese mark on the bottom, very faint but in a double square, in red marking,,it is raised white dots and blue dots on very thick black cover…also lots of gold decoration…any ideas? the crackling is very fine such as would be the age…

  4. Mike K says:
    16 years ago

    Hello Greg oram: You can send me some photos of your vases to my email. I can have a look for you.
    karryk08@gmail.com
    Rgds,
    Mike K

    quote Greg oram Says:
    March 24th, 2010 at 10:39 am

    I have two yellow vases with black dragons and sun signs that that came out of so. Vietnam in 1975 from a museum that was going to be destroyed by No. Vietnam an brought to the USA. Looking for info on vases maybe looking for a buyer, have pictures if interested. email me soon

  5. Joe Stokes says:
    14 years ago

    I have a bronzeware set that im trying to get appraised is there someone that can help me ? Its from october 1967in a wooden box awarded to a Thomas H Moorer from royal thai marine corps my email is jstokes3@verizon.net

  6. Laurie Laskey says:
    9 years ago

    I recently came across a brown ware cup, a house and tree are etched into the clay…etched into the bottom is BIFN-HOA VILTNAM…I took the F and the L to possibly be an E…there are upside down v above the F and L….the inside of the cup appears to be glazed….I was wondering if you might be able to provide me with any information about it….year it was made, region or kiln where it was made….

    Thank you for your time and efforts.

  7. John Forbes says:
    9 years ago

    Bien-Hoa outside HCMC has long hosted kilns for domestic pottery and export. Some pieces can be quite elaborate and beautiful. Bien-Hoa is the southern equivalent of the Bat Trang village kilns outside Hanoi, although not as old as Bat Trang.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Southeast Asian Archaeology

© 2019

Navigate Site

  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
  • Topics
  • Visit
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About

Follow

Never Miss a Discovery
Subscribe for Exclusive Southeast Asian Archaeology News!

Stay connected with the latest breakthroughs, research, and events from across Southeast Asia’s archaeology scene. Sign up today for exclusive weekly updates, trusted by over 2,000 subscribers.

×
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
    • Southeast Asia
    • Mainland Southeast Asia
      • Cambodia
      • Laos
      • Malaysia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
    • Island Southeast Asia
      • Brunei
      • Indonesia
      • Malaysia
      • Philippines
      • Singapore
      • Timor Leste
    • Peripheral Southeast Asia
  • Topics
    • Artifact Type
      • Architecture
      • Bones and Burials
      • Ceramics
      • Intangible Cultural Heritage
      • Lithics
      • Megaliths
      • Rock Art
      • Sculpture
    • Field
      • Anthropology
      • Bioarchaeology
      • Epigraphy
      • General Archaeology
      • Metallurgy and Metalworking
      • Paleontology
      • Underwater Archaeology
      • Visual Art
      • Zooarchaeology
    • Other Themes
      • Animism
      • Buddhism
      • Christianity
      • Disaster Risk Management
      • Hinduism
      • Islam
      • Archaeological Tourism in Southeast Asia
  • Visit
    • Virtual Archaeology
    • Unesco World Heritage
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About
    • Supporters
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2019

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.