• 🏺 Palaces, Pots and Porcelain⠀
⠀
Xin Chào! 🇻🇳 It’s a very Vietnam-heavy week in Southeast Asian archaeology: imperial palaces, ceremonial architecture, ancient brick tombs, early tile kilns, Cham heritage and the return of a Đông Sơn bronze drum.⠀
⠀
🔬 New research from Malaysia finds molecular evidence for dairy processing around 3,000 years ago.⠀
⠀
🏺 And in the Philippines, some very unusual earthenware decorated with fragments of Chinese porcelain tells a story about Manila, material culture and the early colonial encounter.⠀
⠀
There’s plenty more from around Southeast Asia in this week’s newsletter.⠀
⠀
Palaces, Pots and Porcelain — read via the link in bio.⠀
⠀
#Archaeology #SoutheastAsianArchaeology #VietnamArchaeology #MalaysiaArchaeology #PhilippineArchaeology
  • A 4.38-metre-long wooden rudder from the west coast of Sumatra is providing a rare glimpse of Southeast Asian seafaring around 1,300 years ago.

The rudder was recovered at the Bongal Site in Central Tapanuli, North Sumatra. Today the site lies inland, but geomorphological research suggests that in the 7th–8th centuries CE it was part of a shallow bay or estuarine environment.

The quarter rudder was carved from a single log and measures 4.38 metres long. Radiocarbon dating of the wood produced a calibrated date of 656–687 CE, making it the earliest securely dated rudder currently known from Southeast Asia.

Researchers also documented hull planks with raised wooden lugs, dowels and surviving palm-fibre ropes. These suggest that parts of these boats were pegged and tied together—a construction method archaeologists call the Southeast Asian lashed-lug tradition. Differences between the surviving planks even suggest that several vessels may have been present. 

Bongal also produced ceramics, glass, beads and coins pointing to connections with much wider exchange networks. The researchers do not argue that the Bongal boats themselves were making long-distance voyages across the Indian Ocean, but propose that locally constructed vessels formed part of a regional maritime network, moving through rivers and along Sumatra’s coast and connecting communities there to broader systems of exchange.

Reference
Mochtar et al. 2026. “Lashed-Lug Boats from the Bongal Site: New Evidence for Early Maritime Networks on the West Coast of Sumatra.” International Journal of Nautical Archaeology.
10.1080/10572414.2026.2714901

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Indonesia #Sumatra #MaritimeArchaeology #NauticalArchaeology
  • Betel, Boats and Border Stones is this week’s Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsletter.⠀
⠀
This issue starts with a fascinating new paper on ancient teeth from South Sulawesi, where unusual dental wear may point to the habitual sucking of whole areca nuts by pre-agricultural foragers.⠀
⠀
Then we move from teeth to timbers: lashed-lug boat remains from Bongal on Sumatra’s west coast, including a 7th-century quarter rudder, add new detail to Southeast Asia’s early maritime networks.⠀
⠀
And yes, there are more boats: Phanom Surin in Thailand and the Butuan boat sites in the Philippines both make appearances this week.⠀
⠀
Plus: Preah Vihear, Koh Ker, Prambanan, Đông Sơn drums, repatriation, digital heritage, and more.⠀
⠀
Read the full issue at the link in bio.⠀
⠀
#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Archaeology #MaritimeArchaeology
  • People in Sulawesi may have been habitually using a neuroactive plant as far back as 25,000–16,000 years ago.

A new study in Science Advances examines two preagricultural foragers from South Sulawesi, Indonesia, separated by thousands of years but sharing an unusual dental pattern: deep, rounded, circumferential wear that does not match ordinary chewing. The researchers argue that the wear formed through repeatedly holding, sucking or gently gnawing a small, hard object in different parts of the mouth. 

Using LC-MS, the team detected arecoline—a characteristic alkaloid of areca, or “betel”, nut—in dental samples from both individuals. One came from Leang Bulu Bettue and dates to 25–16 ka; the other, from Leang Cappalombo 1, is associated with deposits dating to around 7.6–6.3 ka. 

This was probably not betel chewing in the form familiar today. Modern betel quid typically combines processed areca nut with slaked lime and other ingredients. To test whether a simpler practice was plausible, the researchers soaked intact areca nuts and applied the resulting solutions to cells expressing human receptors. The experiments showed that intact nuts could release physiologically active arecoline without slaked lime. Combined with the dental wear, chemical residues and experiments support the authors’ interpretation that these foragers habitually sucked whole areca nuts.

For now, the sample is just two individuals, and psuggestions that the nuts were used for stimulation, pain relief or medicinal purposes remain hypotheses. What the study does show is that habitual neuroactive plant use may reach far deeper into the hunter-gatherer past than the archaeological record had previously demonstrated. 

Reference
Brumm et al. 2026. “Betel nut sucking is the earliest recorded evidence for the habitual use of a neuroactive plant drug.” Science Advances.
10.1126/sciadv.aei1901

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Sulawesi #IndonesiaArchaeology #Prehistory #BetelNut
  • Twenty-two small beads can preserve the traces of a much larger world of movement and exchange.

A new archaeometric study examines beads excavated in 2023 at Khok Phithak, within the ancient city of Khu Bua in Ratchaburi, central Thailand. Khu Bua was an important urban centre associated with the Dvaravatī cultural sphere, enclosed by earthen ramparts and moats and situated within the Mae Klong river system. 

The researchers analysed 21 glass beads and one chalcedony/agate bead, combining microscopic observations with VP-SEM-EDS, LA-ICP-MS and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Manufacturing traces—including axial colour streaks and elongated bubbles—indicate that most of the glass beads were made by drawing glass into tubes or canes before cutting them into individual beads. 

Their chemistry indicates that nineteen beads belong to the m-Na-Al-1 glass subgroup, consistent with glassmaking traditions documented in South Asia, particularly the wider technological sphere of southern India and Sri Lanka. Together with their manufacturing technique, the authors associate these beads with the large-scale Indo-Pacific beadmaking tradition. 

However, one blue bead, B014, is made from plant-ash soda–lime glass with a broad western Asian affinity—although the study cannot identify a specific production centre. Another remarkable bead, B007, appears to have been wound from recycled iron-smelting slag, suggesting an entirely different production history.

Rather than evidence for primary glassmaking at Khu Bua itself, the authors interpret the assemblage as reflecting an inland centre of consumption and possibly redistribution, connected through maritime and riverine networks to much wider systems of Indian Ocean exchange. 

Reference
Risteka et al. 2026. “Production Technology and Provenance of Dvaravatī Glass Beads from Khu Bua, Central Thailand: An Archaeometric Study.” Heritage 9, 347.
10.3390/heritage9090347

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #ThailandArchaeology #Dvaravati #KhuBua #ancienttrade
  • Small finds, big stories this week.⠀
⠀
The latest Southeast Asian Archaeology newsletter focuses on Thailand, with newly reported rock art, worrying news of looting, and two new papers showing what archaeological science can reveal from humble materials.⠀
⠀
One study looks at prehistoric pottery from Don Up Mung in Nong Bua Lamphu, tracing differences in clay composition, firing and production choices. Another follows glass beads from Khu Bua in Ratchaburi into the wider world of South Asian glassmaking and Indian Ocean exchange.⠀
⠀
Also: a LOT of opportunities this week — jobs, scholarships, courses and calls for papers.⠀
⠀
Link in bio⠀
⠀
#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Archaeology #CulturalHeritage #ArchaeologicalScience
  • Can inscriptions help reconstruct how a kingdom expanded across a landscape?

King Citrasena (Chitrasen, later known as Mahendravarman) ruled Chenla in the late 6th to early 7th centuries, during a period when Chenla’s influence was extending across parts of what are now Cambodia, Laos and northeastern Thailand. His reign is known partly through inscriptions recording religious foundations, royal achievements and other acts of authority. 

Pailoplee and Khatshima map 21 inscriptions from at least 19 locations associated with Citrasena, and asked if people were moving between these places, which routes would they have taken? To explore this, they use Least Cost Path (LCP) modelling in a GIS. LCP calculates routes that minimise the “cost” of movement across terrain.

In archaeology, this can help identify plausible corridors shaped by features such as slopes, river valleys and mountain barriers. These models show how movement could have been structured by the landscape under the assumptions of the model.

Across several scenarios, the reconstructed paths repeatedly concentrate around major river systems—especially the Mun River—and particular passes through the Phnom Dong Rek (Dangrek) mountain range. The authors also compare the modelled network with archaeological sites attributed to Citrasena’s period, many of which fall along these reconstructed corridors.

Where river navigation would have been difficult (such as the Khone Phapheng Falls), the authors propose that Citrasena’s forces may instead have moved overland along riverbanks, using waterways as natural guides through the landscape.

The placement of several inscriptions near river confluences also suggests that these locations may have been important for controlling movement, communication and exchange, not simply access to water.

Reference
Pailoplee, S. & Khatshima, K. 2026. “The role of King Chitrasen (Mahendravarman) in the expansion of the Chenla Kingdom: A study of inscriptions and historical geography.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 14, 103503.
10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103503

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Cambodia #Thailand #Laos #Chenla
  • Sometimes the biggest archaeological questions depend on evidence we cannot see during excavation.

Microarchaeology investigates archaeological deposits at microscopic and microstratigraphic scales. In Southeast Asia, this can be especially valuable because monsoonal wetness, tropical weathering, intensive land use and complex depositional histories can affect how archaeological evidence survives. 

Researchers can examine the surrounding sediment for traces of past activity and later disturbance. Methods discussed in this new paper include sediment micromorphology, laboratory micro-excavation, high-resolution imaging, FTIR microscopy and SEM-EDS. Depending on the context, microscopic evidence can help identify burning, trampling, plant processing, sediment movement and environmental change. 

The importance of that context is illustrated by work in northern Laos. At Tam Ngu Hao 2, microstratigraphy was used alongside lithological observations and dating to establish the stratigraphic context of Denisovan fossil evidence. At Tam Pà Ling, it has shown potential for investigating environmental seasonality and possible patterns of early modern human presence. These methods help archaeologists understand what happened to a deposit before drawing conclusions from what it contains.
 
The paper also introduces the Australian Microarchaeology and Palaeosciences Facility (AusMAP) and argues for greater collaboration, training and locally based microarchaeological expertise across Southeast Asia. 

Reference:
Hernandez et al. 2026. Scaling down to look further back: Southeast Asia, deep-time science and microarchaeology. SPAFA Journal 10.
10.26721/spafajournal.651369a4y8 

#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Archaeology #Microarchaeology #Geoarchaeology #ArchaeologicalScience
  • This week on Southeast Asian Archaeology: claims, contexts and careful reading.⠀
⠀
With Malaysia’s National Day, Vietnam’s National Day, Timor-Leste’s Popular Consultation Day, and International Literacy Day all close together, I’m thinking about literacy not just as reading words, but reading evidence: museum labels, old spellings, dates, maps, artefacts, archives, and the occasional viral post with a raised eyebrow.⠀
⠀
The catalyst this week is the recent controversy over historical claims in Malaysia, alongside a timely RSIS piece on how historians, archaeologists, archivists, librarians and curators can help push back against disinformation. Not by attacking people, but by helping everyone ask better questions of the past.⠀
⠀
Also in this week’s issue: Penang’s historical Malay spellings, Cambodia’s new artefact database grant, Singapore’s revised History Gallery, UNESCO’s maritime museum project, new research on Sundadonty, Roti Island, Chenla inscriptions, ancient Myanmar, and more.⠀
⠀
Link in bio.⠀
⠀
#SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Archaeology #Heritage #InformationLiteracy
  • How old are the rock paintings of Mainland Southeast Asia? 🎨🪨

A new study from Mangguan in Yunnan, southwestern China, provides another important piece of the puzzle.

Using uranium-thorium dating, researchers analysed tiny calcite deposits that had formed over the paintings. Because the calcite must be younger than the pigment underneath, the dates provide a minimum age for the art. One deposit covering a human figure shows that the painting was already there at least 4,220 years ago.

Mangguan is particularly interesting because it lies only about 15 km from the better-known Cangyuan rock art complex. The two have stylistic similarities and overlapping dates, suggesting they formed part of a broader regional rock art tradition, a comparison can be taken farther south.

The rock paintings at Pha Taem in Luang Prabang, Laos, have previously been compared with Cangyuan, raising intriguing questions about relationships between the rock art traditions of southwestern China and Mainland Southeast Asia.

Most rock art in Mainland Southeast Asia remains poorly dated, so dates like those from Mangguan give us increasingly useful chronological anchors for thinking about these connections.

References:
Wu, Y. et al. 2026. U-Th dating of rock paintings in southwestern China: minimum age of ~4.2 ka BP at the Mangguan site. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 74, 105987. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105987.

Bo, X. 2020. On the relationship between the Cangyuan rock art in Yunnan, China, and the Pha Taem rock art in Laos. Rock Art Research 37(2).

Tan, N.H. 2018. The Cliff Paintings of Pha Taem, Luang Prabang, Lao PDR. Rock Art Research 35(1).

#RockArt #SoutheastAsianArchaeology #Yunnan #China
Tuesday, September 22, 2026
Southeast Asian Archaeology
  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
    • Southeast Asia
    • Mainland Southeast Asia
      • Cambodia
      • Laos
      • Malaysia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
    • Island Southeast Asia
      • Brunei
      • Indonesia
      • Malaysia
      • Philippines
      • Singapore
      • Timor Leste
    • Peripheral Southeast Asia
  • Topics
    • Artifact Type
      • Architecture
      • Bones and Burials
      • Ceramics
      • Intangible Cultural Heritage
      • Lithics
      • Megaliths
      • Rock Art
      • Sculpture
    • Field
      • Anthropology
      • Bioarchaeology
      • Epigraphy
      • General Archaeology
      • Metallurgy and Metalworking
      • Paleontology
      • Underwater Archaeology
      • Visual Art
      • Zooarchaeology
    • Other Themes
      • Animism
      • Buddhism
      • Christianity
      • Disaster Risk Management
      • Hinduism
      • Islam
      • Archaeological Tourism in Southeast Asia
  • Visit
    • Virtual Archaeology
    • Unesco World Heritage
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About
    • Supporters
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Southeast Asian Archaeology
  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
    • Southeast Asia
    • Mainland Southeast Asia
      • Cambodia
      • Laos
      • Malaysia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
    • Island Southeast Asia
      • Brunei
      • Indonesia
      • Malaysia
      • Philippines
      • Singapore
      • Timor Leste
    • Peripheral Southeast Asia
  • Topics
    • Artifact Type
      • Architecture
      • Bones and Burials
      • Ceramics
      • Intangible Cultural Heritage
      • Lithics
      • Megaliths
      • Rock Art
      • Sculpture
    • Field
      • Anthropology
      • Bioarchaeology
      • Epigraphy
      • General Archaeology
      • Metallurgy and Metalworking
      • Paleontology
      • Underwater Archaeology
      • Visual Art
      • Zooarchaeology
    • Other Themes
      • Animism
      • Buddhism
      • Christianity
      • Disaster Risk Management
      • Hinduism
      • Islam
      • Archaeological Tourism in Southeast Asia
  • Visit
    • Virtual Archaeology
    • Unesco World Heritage
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About
    • Supporters
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Southeast Asian Archaeology
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Source: Bangkok Post 20240801

Southeast Asia’s Ruins: The Case for Minimal Restoration

1 August 2024
0
104

...

Source: Vietnam Express 20240731

Hoi An’s Pagoda Bridge Repainted After ‘Too New’ Complaints

1 August 2024
0
68

...

Source: Khmer Times 20240731

Restoration Begins at Trapeang Phong Temple in Angkor Park

1 August 2024
0
56

...

Source: Borneo Post 20240730

Niah Caves to Attract Global Researchers

1 August 2024
0
37

...

Popular This Week

  • Southeast Asian Archaeology memes that will tickle your funny bone and also make you ponder

    Southeast Asian Archaeology memes that will tickle your funny bone and also make you ponder

    68 shares
    Share 68 Tweet 0
  • The most influential books on Southeast Asian Archaeology (a crowdsourced list)

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Southeast Asian Archaeology from a Rock Art Perspective (with annotations)

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Negritos or Malays: Who are the original inhabitants of the Philippines?

    2 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 0
  • Rediscovering Bohol’s Prehistoric Paintings and Burials

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

If you found this site useful, you can help support it by buying me a coffee!

[Obituary] Pou Saveros

6 July 2020
in Uncategorised
49
SHARES
844
VIEWS
Tribute Pou Saverous. Source: Heng Piphal 2020

Tribute Pou Saverous. Source: Heng Piphal 2020

The great Khmer epigrapher Prof. Pou Saveros passed away last month. This tribute in English was penned by Dr Heng Piphal, who has allowed me to share it here. I had posted this on Facebook earlier over the weekend. RIP

Cambodia bids farewell to Professor Pou Saveros, a Titan* of Khmer studies

Professor Pou Saveros, renowned Khmer linguist, epigrapher, and specialist in Sanskrit-Pali, passed away in Paris on June 25, 2020 at the age of 90: only 81 days short of her 91 birthday on August 24, 2020. Raised in an affluent Phnom Penh family, Professor Pou was among the first Cambodian women to earn a higher education degree abroad. She received her state doctorate (doctorat d’état) degree in 1979 and joined the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS). There she taught and mentored many students in modern and old Khmer at the Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales (INALCO), the Université Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris 3, and the École française d’extrême-orient (EFEO) (Ham 2016; Chhom et al 2020).

A fierce promoter of Khmer studies, Prof. Pou authored more than 150 publications on various aspects of Khmer civilization including language, religions, philosophies, and ecology using written records (see AEFEK 2020 and Pou 2003). Dissatisfied with the Indo-centric bias in Khmer research on religion and art history, Prof. Pou advocated instead for an independent “Khmerology”: the systematic and multidisciplinary approach to Khmer research that integrated world history research with linguistics, epigraphy, and archaeology (Pou 2000). The accompanying bibliography illustrates her broad scholarly publication record in Khmerology. We also note that her extensive collaboration with Philip Jenner produced invaluable source materials on Khmer chbap: didactic poetry on philosophy, moral, and social values (e.g., 1976, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1981). Such work, as Khmerology, produced new understandings of premodern and modern Khmer language and civilization.

Redefining Cambodia’s “post-Angkorian” or “Dark Age” as the “Middle Period” was perhaps Prof. Pou’s greatest accomplishment. In doing so, she bridged colonial notions of “discontinuity” or “abandonment” or “lost” narratives with the emergence of modern Cambodia (see Ang et al. 1998, 72-81; Thompson 1997,22-23; 1999,335-336n1). To Prof. Pou, Angkor’s civilization did not vanish, but instead transformed during the Middle period. Her analyses of Rāmkerti (the Middle period transformation of Hindu epic Ramayana) and of Middle period Khmer inscriptions, for example, reflect this paradigm. The Angkor civilization that scholars consider “lost” was already “found” in the Middle period: through Prof. Pou’s career-long research on the topic [e.g., Ang (2007), Mikaelian (2015), and Thompson (1998; 2000) illustrated these narratives].
The passing of Professor Pou Saveros, preceded a few years earlier by the passing of prominent scholars of Khmer studies like scholars Michael Vickery and Claude Jacques, closes a chapter in the formative era in Khmer studies. These scholars’ visions and legacies guide succeeding generations of multinational scholars, including an ever-increasing number of Khmer archaeologists, epigraphers, historians, and linguists, to understand Cambodia’s rich and storied past. We are grateful for their intellectual contributions to the field.

* I am inspired by the title used by Grégory Mikaelian (a student of Pou Saveros) for the late Prof. Au Chiang, another prominent Khmer scholar (Mikaelian 2019). I was, in fact, hesitant to write this short tribute to Prof. Pou because I only met her once when she presented a lecture at RUFA in 1998 and because scholars that I cited here are more qualified than I am. Yet, her presence loomed large when I began my doctoral and postdoctoral research on Khmer political economy. To pay homage to my forebears and compatriots who built and advanced my field, and with encouragement and contribution from Dr. Miriam Stark, I wish to contribute this short obituary to Prof. Pou Saveros. May she attain the supreme bliss of nirvāna. Piphal Heng, Honolulu July 03, 2020.

** Both photographs came from Preap Chanmara’s Facebook post dated June 28, 2020.

*** If you would like copies of Prof. Pou’s selected publications listed in the “Selected works” section of this document, please contact hengpiphal@gmail.com and miriams@hawaii.edu.

Selected references
AEFEK. 2020. “Traveaux de Khmérisants: POU, Saveros.” Blog. Association d’échanges et de Formation Pour Les Études Khmères. 2020.
Ang, Choulean. 2007. “In the Beginning Was the Bayon.” In Bayon: New Perspectives, edited by Joyce Clark, 362–77. Bangkok: River Books Press.
Ang, Choulean, Eric Prenowitz, Ashley Thompson, and Molyvann Vann. 1998. Angkor, a Manual for the Past, Present, and the Future. UNESCO with the United Nations Development Program [and] Swedish International Development Agency.
Chhom, Kunthea, Vy Van, and Chan Mara Preap. 2020. Biography of Professor Pou Saveros (in Khmer). Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Unpublished Document Presented during Professor Pou Savros’ memorial ceremony at the Buddhist Institute.
Ham, Chhay Ly. 2016. Biography of Professor Pou Saveros (in Khmer). Paris: Unpublished Document of the Elibrary of Cambodia. http://www.elibraryofcambodia.org/biology-dr-pov-savvorn/….
Mikaelian, Grégory. 2015. “The Idea of Decline and of Attempts at Renaissance of Middle Period Cambodia (In Khmer: គំនិតថាប្រទេសខ្មែរចុះស្រុតឱនថយនិងប្រឹងងើបឡើងវិញនៅសម័យកណ្តាល).” UDAYA, Journal of Khmer Studies 13: 35–45.
———. 2019. “Le grū du Parnasse. Au Chhieng chez les Titans.” Péninsule 78 (1): 93–142.
Thompson, Ashley. 1997. “Changing Perspectives: Cambodia after Angkor.” In Sculpture of Angkor and Ancient Cambodia: Millennium of Glory, 22–32. Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art.
———. 1998. “The Ancestral Cult in Transition: Reflections on Spatial Organisation of Cambodia’s Early Theravāda Complex.” In Southeast Asian Archaeology 1996. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, Leiden, 2-6 September 1996, edited by Marijke J Klokke and Thomas de Brujin, 273–95. Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Hull.
———. 2000. “Lost and Found: The Stupa, the Four-Faced Buddha, and the Seat of Royal Power in Middle Cambodia.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, Berlin, 31 August-4 September 1998, edited by Wibke Lobo and Stefanie Reimann, 245–64. Hull: Centre for South-East Asian Studies, University of Hull &​ Ethnologisches Museum, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin Stiftung Preuischer Kulturbesitz.

Selected works by Professor Pou Saveros (for an exhaustive list, see AEFEK and Pou 2003)

Pou, Saveros. 1965. Music and Dance in Ancient Cambodia as Evidenced by Old Khmer Epigraphy. Journal of the Siam Society II:283-292.
———. 1967. La toponymie khmère. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 53(2):375-451. (as Lewitz)
———. 1970. VI. Textes en khmer moyen. Inscriptions modernes d’Angkor 2 et 3. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 57:99-126. (as Lewitz)
———. 1972. Les inscriptions modernes d’Angkor Vat. Journal Asiatique (260):107-129.
———. 1974. The Word ĀC in Khmer: a Semantic Overview. In South-East Asian Linguistic Studies, edited by Nguyen Dang Liem, 175-191. Canberra: Australian National University.
———. 1974. Les inscriptions modernes d’Angkor 35, 36, 37 et 39. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 61:301-337. (as Lewitz)
———. 1975. Inscriptions modernes d’Angkor 34 et 38. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 62:283-353. (as Pou-Lewitz)
———. 1977. Études sur le Rāmakerti: XVIe-XVIIe siècles. Vol. 111. Publications de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient.
———. 1977. Inscriptions en khmer moyen de Vat Athvea (K. 262). Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 64:151-166. (as Pou-Lewitz)
———. 1978. VII. Inscription dite de Brai Svây ou “Bois des Manguiers” de Sukhoday. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 65(2): 333-359. (as Pou-Lewitz)
———. 1979. Subhāsit and Cpāp’ in Khmer Literature. In Ludwik Sternbach Felicitation Volume, Part 1, edited by Jagdama Prasad Sinha, 331-348. Lucknow, India: Akhila Bharatiya Sanskrit Parishad.
———. 1981. Inscriptions khmères K. 39 et K. 27. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 70: 121-134. (as Pou-Lewitz)
———. 1981. Inscriptions khmères K. 144 et K. 177. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 70: 101-120. (as Pou-Lewitz)
———. 1991. Les noms de monuments khmers. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 78:203-227. (as Pou-Lewitz)
———. 1992. Indigenization of Rāmāyana in Cambodia. Asian Folklore Studies 51(1):89-102.
———. 1996. Les termes grammaticaux du vieux khmer (VIe-XIVe siècle). Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 83:21-34. (as Pou-Lewitz)
———. 1998. Dieux et rois dans la pensée Khmère ancienne. Journal Asiatique 286(2):653-669.
———. 2000. What is Khmerology? (in Khmer). Translated by Sotheara Vong. Public lecture hosted by the Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts and the Buddhist Institute in 1998. Phnom Penh: Unpublished.
———. 2001. Nouvelles inscriptions du cambodge: II & III. Vol. 2 & 3. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient.
———. 2002. Āśrama dans l’ancien Cambodia. Journal Asiatique 290(1):315-339.
———. 2002. Nouveau regard sur Śiva-Īśvara au Cambodge. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 89:145-182. (as Pou-Lewitz)
———. 2003. Selected Papers on Khmerology/ Choix d’articles de khmerologie. Phnom Penh: Reyum Publishing.
———. 2004. Dictionnaire Vieux Khmer-Français-Anglais = An Old Khmer-French-English Dictionary = Vacanānukram Khmaer Câs-Pārāṃṅ-Qaṅles. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
———. 2008. Kalpanā in Ancient Cambodia. In Interpreting Southeast Asia’s Past: Monument, Image and Text, edited by Elisabeth A. Bacus, Ian C. Glover and Peter De. Sharrock, 241-247. Singapore: NUS Press Pte Ltd.
———. 2011. Nouvelles inscriptions du cambodge. Vol. 4. Paris: l’Harmattan.

Pou-Lewitz, Saveros and Philip N. Jenner. 1975. IX. Les cpàp’ ou “Codes de conduite” khmers I. Cpàp kerti kál. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 62:369-394.
———.1976. VI. Les cpàp’ ou “Codes de conduite” khmers II. Cpàp prus. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 63:313-350.
———.1977. VII. Les cpàp’ ou “Codes de conduite” khmers III. Cpàp kun cau. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 64:167-215.
———.1978. VIII. Les cpàp’ ou “Codes de conduite” khmers IV. Cpàp Rajaneti ou Cpàp Brah Râjasambhâr. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 65:361-402.
———. 1979. VI. Les cpàp’ ou “Codes de conduite” khmers V. Cpàp Kram. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 66:129-160.
———.1981. Les cpàp’ ou “Codes de conduite” khmers. Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême Orient 70: 135-193.

https://www.facebook.com/hengpiphal/posts/10221982734295380

Subscribe to the weekly Southeast Asian Archaeology news digest

Latest Books

The following are affiliate links for which I may earn a commission if you click and make a purchase. Click here for more books about Cambodian archaeology.
Sale The Angkorian World (Routledge Worlds)
The Angkorian World (Routledge Worlds)
Amazon Prime
$250.00
Buy on Amazon
Reconstructing God: Style, Hydraulics, Political Power and Angkor's West Mebon Visnu
Reconstructing God: Style, Hydraulics, Political...
Amazon Prime
$85.00
Buy on Amazon
Early Theravadin Cambodia: Perspectives from Art and Archaeology (Art and Archaeology of Southeast Asia: Hindu-Buddhist Traditions)
Early Theravadin Cambodia: Perspectives from Art...
Amazon Prime
$48.00
Buy on Amazon
Museum-Making in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia: Cultural Institutions and Policies from Colonial to Post-Colonial Times
Museum-Making in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia:...
$41.79
Buy on Amazon
Photography in Cambodia: 1866 to the Present
Photography in Cambodia: 1866 to the Present
$27.92
Buy on Amazon
Four Lost Cities: A Secret History of the Urban Age
Four Lost Cities: A Secret History of the Urban...
Amazon Prime
$30.21
Buy on Amazon

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Southeast Asian Archaeology

© 2019

Navigate Site

  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
  • Topics
  • Visit
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About

Follow

Never Miss a Discovery
Subscribe for Exclusive Southeast Asian Archaeology News!

Stay connected with the latest breakthroughs, research, and events from across Southeast Asia’s archaeology scene. Sign up today for exclusive weekly updates, trusted by over 2,000 subscribers.

×
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Resources
  • Countries
    • Southeast Asia
    • Mainland Southeast Asia
      • Cambodia
      • Laos
      • Malaysia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
    • Island Southeast Asia
      • Brunei
      • Indonesia
      • Malaysia
      • Philippines
      • Singapore
      • Timor Leste
    • Peripheral Southeast Asia
  • Topics
    • Artifact Type
      • Architecture
      • Bones and Burials
      • Ceramics
      • Intangible Cultural Heritage
      • Lithics
      • Megaliths
      • Rock Art
      • Sculpture
    • Field
      • Anthropology
      • Bioarchaeology
      • Epigraphy
      • General Archaeology
      • Metallurgy and Metalworking
      • Paleontology
      • Underwater Archaeology
      • Visual Art
      • Zooarchaeology
    • Other Themes
      • Animism
      • Buddhism
      • Christianity
      • Disaster Risk Management
      • Hinduism
      • Islam
      • Archaeological Tourism in Southeast Asia
  • Visit
    • Virtual Archaeology
    • Unesco World Heritage
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About
    • Supporters
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

© 2019

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.