This would not be a surprise to you if you’ve visited Angkor in recent years. The overgrown temple Ta Prohm is fast becoming referred to as the ‘Tomb Raider Temple’ or the ‘Angelina Jolie Temple’, due to the actresses’ filming a scene there. A Hindu leader recently called on the actress to use her influence to better protect the heritage of Angkor. Incidentally, Ta Prohm isn’t even the ancient name of the temple – its original name was Rajavihara.
photo credit: macloop
Holy Jolie: Cambodian temple takes Angelina’s name
The Guardian, 25 November 2010
… and no, he doesn’t look like Angelina Jolie, either. But the Cambodian man was caught using an “electric-powered machine” gathering artefacts near the Takeo temple.
photo credit: sebastian ceriani
Angkor tomb raider nabbed by police
Phnom Penh Post, 02 July 2009
27 June 2006 (Bangkok Post) – Here’s one for potential robust discussion: where is the line between archaeology and tomb raiding?
We often read of new discoveries of tombs or graves found by archaeologists. I would like to know just who gives these people the right to uncover the final resting place of anyone, be it kings, monarchs or any other individual? Where do we draw the line on illegal grave robbers, or opening thousand year old tombs?
If I, or any one today were to die and be buried with a $300,000 [11.5 million baht] ring on our finger, and someone were to dig up our grave and steal the ring, they would be subject to arrest, and a long prison term. So why then, is it okay to rob the graves or tombs of ancients, in the name of archaeology?
Every living being deserves the right to be buried after death, and expect his eternal resting place to be sacred, and not disturbed.
Soi Keow Noi