<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pole photography for archaeology – Part 2: Field Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/2009/11/24/pole-photography-archaeology-part-2-field-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/2009/11/24/pole-photography-archaeology-part-2-field-testing/</link>
	<description>News, resources, books and podcasts about the archaeology and ancient history of Southeast Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:33:25 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: noelbynature</title>
		<link>http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/2009/11/24/pole-photography-archaeology-part-2-field-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-23191</link>
		<dc:creator>noelbynature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/?p=2592#comment-23191</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, it wobbles a fair bit, which is why I&#039;m restricted to shooting at fast speeds and perhaps using the flash. The wobbling is to be expected, since the pole is lightweight. I expect if a stronger material was used (like say, aluminum) it might wobble less, but the setup would weigh a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, it wobbles a fair bit, which is why I&#8217;m restricted to shooting at fast speeds and perhaps using the flash. The wobbling is to be expected, since the pole is lightweight. I expect if a stronger material was used (like say, aluminum) it might wobble less, but the setup would weigh a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/2009/11/24/pole-photography-archaeology-part-2-field-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-23179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/?p=2592#comment-23179</guid>
		<description>I think it definitely works, no doubt about that! Canon usually has all kinds of filters available to expand or narrow the mm, also for non-DSLR&#039;s. (Ok, some quality loss, but better than upgrading the camera? ;))

A solution for the &#039;wobly&#039; pole, would to make it more heavy, and put a more solid support for it (often the pole is attached to a car). 

One of my favourites here in the UK is Aerial Cam, you really ought to check out their portfolio under &#039;archaeology various&#039;. 

http://www.theimagefile.com/web/aerial-cam/portfolio.html

Cheers,
Ann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it definitely works, no doubt about that! Canon usually has all kinds of filters available to expand or narrow the mm, also for non-DSLR&#8217;s. (Ok, some quality loss, but better than upgrading the camera? <img src='http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>A solution for the &#8216;wobly&#8217; pole, would to make it more heavy, and put a more solid support for it (often the pole is attached to a car). </p>
<p>One of my favourites here in the UK is Aerial Cam, you really ought to check out their portfolio under &#8216;archaeology various&#8217;. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.theimagefile.com/web/aerial-cam/portfolio.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theimagefile.com/web/aerial-cam/portfolio.html</a></p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Ann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/2009/11/24/pole-photography-archaeology-part-2-field-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-23178</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/?p=2592#comment-23178</guid>
		<description>Did it wobble? And I hope you didn&#039;t damage the camera against the rock! The photo of the hole looks good considering the height above the floor. Pity there was no bird in the hole to smile at the camera!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did it wobble? And I hope you didn&#8217;t damage the camera against the rock! The photo of the hole looks good considering the height above the floor. Pity there was no bird in the hole to smile at the camera!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
