Seized Maitum artefacts may represent another tribe

Stylistic differences indicate that the anthropomorphic jars that were seized earlier as part of an illegal haul in Maitum may represent a different tribe from that was excavated in 1991. The looters apparently used the published archaeological report on the Maitum jars as a reference when they recovered the jars years before.

Seized cultural artifacts in Maitum: remnants from yet another ancient Mindanawon tribe
MindaNews, 22 September 2008

Vigilance by residents, the police, the local government in Maitum, Sarangani and the provincial government has paid off: five of the 22 sacks of cultural artifacts seized by the police last month have been transported to the National Museum as initial inspection by archaeologist Dr. Eusebio Dizon showed the shards from anthropomorphic burial jars are different from the now-famous “faces from Maitum.”

“They’re a different people. They’re a bit different from the Maitum collection that’s why it’s good to know how different they really are,” Dizon said when he passéd by the provincial police headquarters in Alabel, Sarangani from Balut Island on September 11, on his way to Manila, to check on the artifacts as directed by the National Museum.


Like this post? Share it on:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
You might also be interested in:
Looted artefacts may represent an entirely different tribe
Smuggled Maitum jars represent a distinct group
Maitum jars: 22 bags of artefacts seized
Maitum jar diorama on display from next week
Foreigner sues Government to recover artefacts

Tags: Eusibio Dizon, looting, Maitum jars


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Leave a Reply



Powered by WebRing.