<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Khmer sites given heritage status</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/2007/05/03/thailand-khmer-sites-given-heritage-status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/2007/05/03/thailand-khmer-sites-given-heritage-status/</link>
	<description>News, resources, books and podcasts about the archaeology and ancient history of Southeast Asia</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  9 Jan 2009 00:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Hoerstemeier</title>
		<link>http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/2007/05/03/thailand-khmer-sites-given-heritage-status/#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Hoerstemeier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/2007/05/03/thailand-khmer-sites-given-heritage-status/#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>Either Bangkok Post or you have gotten it wrong - sadly the article you refer to is no longer accessible. The two sites (Phimai, Phanom Rung, Muang Tam and some minor ruins are to be inscribed as one) are still on the tentative list of sites which may be inscribed later. See also this Post article published four weeks later: http://www.bangkokpost.net/240607_Perspective/24Jun2007_pers08.php

And there are even more 9 sites which Thailand proposed, but which haven't yet made it into the tentative list. http://www.onep.go.th/knowledgebase/news_elec04.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either Bangkok Post or you have gotten it wrong - sadly the article you refer to is no longer accessible. The two sites (Phimai, Phanom Rung, Muang Tam and some minor ruins are to be inscribed as one) are still on the tentative list of sites which may be inscribed later. See also this Post article published four weeks later: <a href="http://www.bangkokpost.net/240607_Perspective/24Jun2007_pers08.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bangkokpost.net/240607_Perspective/24Jun2007_pers08.php</a></p>
<p>And there are even more 9 sites which Thailand proposed, but which haven&#8217;t yet made it into the tentative list. <a href="http://www.onep.go.th/knowledgebase/news_elec04.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.onep.go.th/knowledgebase/news_elec04.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
